Stewart Squared
Episode #71: The AI Momentum Trap: When Venture Models Replace Business Models
- AI & Agents
- Osborne effect
- Atari
- chat GPT
- Sam Altman
- portable computer
- product announcements
- code red
- OpenAI
Listen
Download MP3About this episode
In this episode of the Stewart Squared Podcast, host Stewart Alsop sits down with his father Stewart Alsop II for another fascinating father-son discussion about the tech industry. They dive into the Osborne effect - a business phenomenon from the early computer days where premature product announcements can destroy current sales - and explore how this dynamic is playing out in today's AI landscape. Their conversation covers OpenAI's recent strategic missteps, Google's competitive response with Gemini and TPUs, the circular revenue patterns between major tech companies, and why we might be witnessing fundamental shifts in the AI chip market. They also examine the current state of coding AI tools, the difference between LLMs and true AGI, and whether the tech industry's sophistication can prevent historical bubble patterns from repeating.
Timestamps
05:53 The Competitive Landscape of AI
12:03 Understanding the AI Bubble
21:00 The Value of AI in Coding and Everyday Tasks
28:47 The Limitations of AI: Creativity and Human Intuition
33:42 The Osborne Effect in AI Development
41:14 US vs China: The Global AI Landscape
Key Insights
- The Osborne Effect remains highly relevant in today's AI landscape. Adam Osborne's company collapsed in the 1980s after announcing their next computer too early, killing current sales. This same strategic mistake is being repeated by AI companies like OpenAI, which announced multiple products prematurely and had to issue a "code red" to refocus on ChatGPT after Google's unified Gemini offering outcompeted their fragmented approach.
- Google has executed a masterful strategic repositioning in AI. While companies like OpenAI scattered their efforts across multiple applications, Google unified everything into Gemini and developed TPUs (Tensor Processing Units) for inference and reasoning tasks, positioning themselves beyond just large language models toward true AI capabilities and forcing major companies like Anthropic, Meta, and even OpenAI to sign billion-dollar TPU deals.
- The AI industry exhibits dangerous circular revenue patterns reminiscent of the dot-com bubble. Companies are signing binding multi-billion dollar contracts with each other - OpenAI contracts with Oracle for data centers, Oracle buys NVIDIA chips, NVIDIA does deals with OpenAI - creating an interconnected web where everyone knows it's a bubble, but the financial commitments are far more binding than simple stock investments.
- Current AI capabilities represent powerful tools rather than AGI, despite the hype. As Yann LeCun correctly argues, Large Language Models that predict the next token based on existing data cannot achieve true artificial general intelligence. However, AI has become genuinely transformative for specific tasks like coding (where Claude dominates) and language translation, making certain professionals incredibly productive while eliminating barriers to prototyping.
- Anthropic has captured the most valuable market segment by focusing on enterprise programmers. While Microsoft's Copilot failed to gain traction by being bolted onto Office, Anthropic strategically targeted IT departments and developers who have budget authority and real technical needs. This focus on coding and enterprise programming has made them a serious competitive threat to Microsoft's traditional enterprise dominance.
- NVIDIA's massive valuation faces existential risk from the shift beyond LLMs. Trading at approximately 25x revenue compared to Google's 10x, NVIDIA's $4.6 trillion valuation depends entirely on GPU demand for training language models. Google's TPU strategy for inference and reasoning represents a fundamental architectural shift that could undermine NVIDIA's dominance, explaining recent stock volatility when major TPU deals were announced.
- AI will excel at tasks humans don't want to do, while uniquely human capabilities remain irreplaceable. The future likely involves AI handling linguistic processing and routine tasks, physical AI managing robotic applications, and ontologies codifying business logic, but creativity, intuition, and imagination represent fundamentally human capacities that cannot be modeled or replicated through data processing, regardless of scale or sophistication.
Episode transcript
Everyone is wrong about AI, but if you know the history of technology, you can be wrong and still be right.
I know the history of technology since I started with the personal computer in 1980. So listen in while we explore what is right about AI.
Welcome to the Stuart Squared podcast. I've got another exciting episode planned today. We're going to talk about the Osborne effect. And somebody recently, I can't say, tweeted, they threaded, but without a thread. It was just one single thread. And they said something about Atari Osborne effect within the context of chat, GPT and Sam Altman announcing something there. It was just like a offhand comment. And I sent it to my dad and he was like, go check out the Osborne effect. And it's a real thing. You want to give them the context of what the Osborne is.
Yeah. So, you know, this whole podcast comes out of me having been around. In the late 70s and early 80s, people were trying to start personal computer businesses, hardware and software, but they'd never run a business before and didn't know much about it. And so they're just kind of going with the flow. A fellow, Adam Osborne, introduced the first portable computer. It was like £35, but it had a handle on it. And you could pick it up and take some. Take it somewhere. This is before Compact, which introduced the most successful first portable computer. And so he's gone along and he's doing really well. And this is the Osborne one, and they're working on a replacement. So I decided to announce it, and if I remember correctly, announced it before Christmas, kind of like in the fall, and said it would be delivered in the spring. And so everybody smartly said, well, well, then I won't buy an Osborne until he delivers this Osborne too. And the company punctibly went out of business. So he basically signaled too early that they were introducing a new product. Every hardware company struggles with the samples. Cut it down to a science. But, you know, when do you announce the next one so you don't destroy sales of the current one? The tweet you sent me, the thread, should we call them up, come up with a name for it? By the way, I mentioned I noticed when I was using threads that if you click on a thread, at least on mobile, it goes from being called threads to being called thread. Really interesting, subtle little thing. Anyway, where was I headed with that?
Your first full transcript is free. After that, an email opens every transcript in the index — a list of readers we can write to, not a guest book.